[Nameplate] Overcast and Breezy ~ 39°F  
Freeze Warning
Saturday, Nov. 1, 2014

State: Stimulus money misspent

Wednesday, December 22, 2010

Federal stimulus money spent on home weatherization improvements for low-income-families is being wasted or misspent, according to Tennessee's Comptroller of the Treasury.

Most of the egregious waste appears to be in big cities. However, Blake Fontenay, spokesman for Comptroller Justin P. Wilson said Tuesday that problems were found in all 18 parts of the state where non-profit agencies administer the federal money.

That includes the Fayetteville-based South Central Human Resources Agency, which serves Marshall, Bedford and other nearby counties. However, Fontenay could not identify a specific issue of waste or misused federal money in South Central Tennessee. That may be in the final report to be issued March 31.

The weatherization program conducts an energy audit of a residence for people who qualify as living in a low-income household. A "Blower Door" is attached to find drafts. Insulation and weather stripping are installed with the idea of lowering energy costs to heat and cool homes, thereby reducing costs -- some of which are paid by the Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program paid by the federal government.

While conceding some problems were found during normal follow-up inspections, Emily Satterfield, the weatherization program director for this area, said none were as bad as insulation poorly wrapped around a water heater with duct tape. That was an example in Nashville illustrated by a photo in Fontenay's release on Monday.

That's when the treasury's comptroller outlined results of the review of the Weatherization Assistance for Low-Income Persons. Wilson sent the report to Virginia T. Lodge, commissioner of the state Department of Human Services. Lodge's agency distributes money to the South Central Human Resources Agency, and 17 other non-profit organizations in Tennessee.

Calls to the state Department of Human Services' Division of Community Services resulted in no contact with an official who would or could comment. A return call was promised.

In April 2009, the U.S. Department of Energy awarded the state $99 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) funds for the program, plus another $7 million in non-ARRA funding during fiscal year 2009-10.

Comments from Satterfield on Monday substantiate a Nashville Public Radio report Tuesday saying that the massive inflow of money, with deadlines for spending to stimulate the economy, overwhelmed the 18 agencies. Consequently, the Comptroller's Division of State Audit would find misuse of federal money.

"We are having some difficulties with some of the new contractors," Satterfield said, again apparently substantiating the radio report that indicated subcontractors of contractors may have hired others to help with the work.

Tradesmen installing insulation and related work "have been trained," Satterfield said. "They received the required TVA training that the state provided for one day.

"We've had some issues identified, but we've corrected them," she said. "We've not had to fire a contractor."

Inspections of contractors' work have been conducted by auditors hired by the agency in Fayetteville. "We use one contracted auditor and we have three agency auditors who've been with us for quite a bit of time," Satterfield said.

"I can see how this could happen if you don't go back and check on them," she said after receiving a copy of Fontenay's report issued Monday.

"Sometimes when you weather strip a door, it makes it hard to open and close the door," Satterfield said. "And the client might take the weather strip out, and so it wouldn't be as tight as it was when we looked at them.

"I know we're all being audited by the state," she said. "They send a group out to look at your files, or to look at the houses themselves."

Satterfield has been administering the weatherization program for several years, so she's familiar with the requirements, adding, "Some new contractors are totally trained into what we want done."

State Sen. Bill Ketron (R-Murfreesboro) represents Marshall County and he's become aware of the weatherization program, most recently because of a request from a woman in Columbia.

"It's up to the agency to interview the contractors," Ketron said.

If abuse is found and substantiated as intentional misuse just to get federal money, then "punitive action should be taken," the state senator said. "They're not only taking advantage of the system, but they're taking advantage of the poor people who need it."

Ketron did not point a finger at any one of the 18 agencies, contractors or subcontractors, but Fontenay said "All these sub recipients had issues identified."

The South Central Human Resources Agency is among many non-profit organizations created nationally because of the Johnson Administration's Great Society initiative that called for the creation of private organizations to administer human services through contracts with the government.

Examples include "meals on wheels, transportation vans taking people to a doctor and dentist, Head Start - a whole array of services - and it's up to them to contract that out," Ketron explained.

Auditors reviewed files for 444 weatherized homes. Deficiencies were found in more than half. Some files lacked adequate documentation, including verification that applicants met income eligibility and completed inspection reports to indicate work was properly performed.

State auditors visited 84 homes that were supposed to receive weatherization. In nearly half, inspectors approved the work but contractors had not performed some weatherization measures, had not properly completed the required weatherization measures or had performed work that was not allowable under the program.

Other deficiencies included the use of uncertified or unauthorized persons to perform energy audits and the use of one unlicensed contractor. In some cases, improvements such as stairs and ramps were built using program funds, even though they provide no weatherization benefits.

Moreover, the auditors noted several instances where critical weatherization measures were recommended but the measures were not performed or should have been recommended and authorized, but were not, such as fixing broken window panes.


Comments
Note: The nature of the Internet makes it impractical for our staff to review every comment. If you feel that a comment is offensive, please Login or Create an account first, and then you will be able to flag a comment as objectionable. Please also note that those who post comments on marshalltribune.com may do so using a screen name, which may or may not reflect a website user's actual name. Readers should be careful not to assign comments to real people who may have names similar to screen names. Refrain from obscenity in your comments, and to keep discussions civil, don't say anything in a way your grandmother would be ashamed to read.

deja vu?

http://www.marshalltribune.com/story/150...

-- Posted by Mr Obvious1 on Thu, Dec 23, 2010, at 6:59 PM

There is something wrong with this program, My daughter has applied and applied and they keep losing her application. She has applied for over five-six years.No where on the application o r information does it states age takes precedent yet she has been told that someone who is elderly takes preference. My daughter is a severe asthmatic,single parent, low income, whose house is in bad need of weatherization, new windows and roof.Her water is brown , undrinkable and she cannot seem to get any assistance from Emily Satterwhite or a complete run around when she calls.I have even called to get an address in Washington DC to report this operation. They are descriminating against my daughter for some reason because of her age? She needs help and she qualifies and we were told it is a first come first sever based on need and income, not by age.

-- Posted by lizagirl on Tue, Jan 17, 2012, at 3:51 PM

addendum. to the above comment.This program has no follow up or record of applications.They should being a federal program should have record of all applications,dates received, approved, or denied and reason for denial to prevent applications from falling in the cracks. Per my conversations with Emily Satterfields office.I have never seen such a poorly management of federal funding program.There does not seem to be any control. Someone like Rep Ketron really needs to investigate this office and the management of federal funds. Another poor example of mismanagement. I say fire them all and get people in there who know how to do the job they are paid to do.

-- Posted by lizagirl on Tue, Jan 17, 2012, at 4:14 PM


Respond to this story

Posting a comment requires free registration. If you already have an account on this site, enter your username and password below. Otherwise, click here to register.

Username:

Password:  (Forgot your password?)

Your comments:
Please be respectful of others and try to stay on topic.